AI 回答引用依据分析 API

确认引用链接是否支持主张

存在链接并不代表回答的每个主张都已验证。API 会将主张与引用页面对照，返回证据摘录、位置和支持范围。

区分主张判定与来源覆盖

区分 exclusive、corroborated、uncited 和 washed；无法读取的来源会保留为不确定性。

找出引用页面真正提供的依据

比较每个主张的证据摘录，可以发现页面只支持部分主张。这是说明性工作流，而不是客户实测结果。

Use Answers to collect the response and count its citation URLs.
Pass the original answer with its citation markers and the corresponding sources to Source Influence.
Review evidence excerpts and unread sources together before deciding what content to update.

通过专用 API 提交

将原始 Markdown 和引用列表发送到 POST /v1/source-influence，结果使用标准轮询或 Webhook 合同返回。

{
  "answer": "The original AI answer to analyze",
  "citations": [
    {
      "url": "https://example.com/source",
      "body": "The actual text of the cited page"
    }
  ]
}

Evidence analysis is not proof of causation

This is post-hoc comparison of an existing answer with supplied or fetched sources. It cannot inspect the model’s internal generation process or prove that a source caused a sentence. Interpret evidence coverage together with fetch failures.

Usage-based analysis pricing

Analysis is metered separately from the 1–2 credit answer engines. Model usage, source fetching and analysis options affect the charge. Read the documented metering and limits before scheduling analyses.

API 文档 ↗